Legal Opinion

United States v. Cox

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 1, 1972No. 25,578PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Duncan, Judge:

This case is before us on three questions certified by the Acting Judge Advocate General.

The Court of Military Review held that pursuant to a pretrial agreement the convening authority must suspend certain portions of appellee’s sentence even though he was guilty of post-trial misconduct. We find this result correct.

Before trial, Cox entered into a pretrial agreement with the convening authority whereby in exchange for his plea of guilty the convening authority agreed to suspend a bad-conduct discharge, if adjudged, and any confinement included in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. United States v. HamillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. ProwUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. United States v. SimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  2. United States v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  3. United States v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  4. United States v. GolightlyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  5. United States v. Sergeant MICHAEL Q. COFFMANArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API