United States v. Cox
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Duncan, Judge:
This case is before us on three questions certified by the Acting Judge Advocate General.
The Court of Military Review held that pursuant to a pretrial agreement the convening authority must suspend certain portions of appellee’s sentence even though he was guilty of post-trial misconduct. We find this result correct.
Before trial, Cox entered into a pretrial agreement with the convening authority whereby in exchange for his plea of guilty the convening authority agreed to suspend a bad-conduct discharge, if adjudged, and any confinement included in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. HamillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. ProwUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. SimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. GolightlyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. Sergeant MICHAEL Q. COFFMANArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020