Heringer v. Schumacher
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This canse is before us upon an appeal by the plaintiffs from an order transferring the place of trial from the county of Sacramento to the city and county of San Francisco. The complaint alleges that the defendants agreed to purchase a certain quantity of beans from the plaintiffs. The title of the action purports to sue the defendants not only as individuals but as doing business under the firm name of Richard J. Murphy. The complaint, however, contains no allegation of the defendants conducting business under that name. The affidavits upon which the place of trial was ordered transferred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Sourbis v. RhoadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Karst v. SellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- McDonald v. California Timber Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Lachman Co. v. Central California Berry Growers' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burrell v. Capt. H. A. Crow Post No. 884California Court of Appeal · 1929
- California Collection Agency, Inc. v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Zumwalt v. SchwarzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- South v. WishardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Seigler v. American Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.