Legal Opinion

Seigler v. American Surety Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 25, 1957No. Civ. 7497PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

Basing its claim on diversity of citizenship between the parties to the action, defendant American Surety Company of New York (hereinafter referred to as American Surety) has removed this action to this Court from the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Siskiyou, where it was originally instituted by the plaintiffs. The action arises out of a contract of insurance. There is no dispute about the jurisdictional amount. The issue of diversity of citizenship of the parties cannot, however, be so readily resolved. It is patent from the record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Wells v. Universal Pictures Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Dunham v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bradford v. Mitchell Brothers Truck LinesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963
  2. Gorman v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
  3. Perrin v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1974
  4. Rookard v. MexicoachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Ingersoll v. PEARL ASSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API