Legal Opinion
Celotex Co. v. Insulite Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 12, 1930No. 1557PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
The allegations of the complaint are substantially as follows:
The plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with an office in Chicago. It has for a long time engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling products made from sugar*214cane fiber. Among these are sugar-cane fiber boards adapted to receive plaster and known as Celotex brand insulating cane-board laths. The plaintiff has developed a large and profitable business in this connection, and owns letters patent of the United States relating thereto, and in particular reissue No. 17,007, issued June 26,1928. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Boston Diatite Co. v. Florence Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Emack v. KaneUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
- A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oil Conservation Engineering Co. v. Brooks Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Select Comfort Corp. v. Sleep Better Store, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- American Ball Co. v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Dehydro, Inc. v. Tretolite Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1931
- Lucasey Manufacturing Corp. v. Anchor Pad International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.