Legal Opinion

Hotel, Restaurant & Soda Fountain Employees Local Union No. 181 v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 25, 1938PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

' The appellee, R. W. Miller, is engaged in the restaurant business in Louisville. He has twenty-five men and women employed, only one of whom belonged to a labor union. The appellant the Hotel, Restaurant and Soda Fountain Employees Local Union No. 181 is an affiliate of the American Federation of Labor. Its coappellant, George Reay, is its organizing representative. During his negotiations with Miller to unionize his restaurant, he and another were permitted to come there and solicit the employees to Join the union. It appears - that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Saulsberry v. Coopers International UnionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Culinary Workers' Union No. 331 v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Music Hall Theatre v. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Local No. 165Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. PittmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Quinton's Market, Inc. v. PattersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Blossom Dairy Co. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lyle v. Local No. 452, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers WorkmenTennessee Supreme Court · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API