Legal Opinion

Lyle v. Local No. 452, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers Workmen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKiNNey

The Court of Appeals, in its opinion transferring the cause to this court because of the constitutional questions involved, made a very clear statement of the controversy, which we adopt since it is not questioned by either party, and which is as follows:

“The complainant, Lyle, the owner and operator of a retail grocery and meat market in the City of Memphis, filed this bill against the defendant organization which, as the name implies, is the local union or branch of the retail butchers union. The president and business manager of the organization were also named as defendants in their…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Auburn Draying Co. v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Thompson v. BoekhoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Retail Clerks' Union, Local No. 148Washington Supreme Court · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Rowe Transfer & Storage Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 621Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bryant v. Tenet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Ira A. Watson Co. v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Purcell v. Journeymen Barbers & Beauticians International Union, Local 192-AMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API