Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hinkle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1898No. 18,443PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From tbe Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, C. J.

This was an action by tbe appellee to quiet the title to certain real estate. We have carefully read the evidence, which is quite conflicting; and, accepting that which is most favorable to the appellee, we are fully satisfied that it supports the verdict and judgment in his favor. Of course, we *344cannot, as appellants’ argument implies, weigh, and pass upon conflicting evidence.' The tract in dispute is but five acres; is quite rough, and but a small portion of it is suitable for cultivation. It has all been uninclosed until recently, when a part of it has been in cultivation and enclosed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roots v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Worthley v. BurbanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Marley v. State ex rel. ChenowethIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. McCaughn v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. May v. DobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Jackson v. CreekIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API