Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Creek

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1911No. 6,888PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Prom Howard Superior Court; P. H. Elliott, Judge. Action by Marion Creek against Jacomiali H. Jackson and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

— Suit for money had and received. Judgment for appellee in the sum of $355.86, against appellants, from which this appeal is taken.

Errors assigned and argued are the overruling (1) of appellants’ motions for a new trial, and (2) their motion for judgment on the answers to the interrogatories, notwithstanding the general verdict.

A new trial was asked on the following grounds: (1) The “damages assessed are excessive;” (2) the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law; (3) erroneously receiving and excluding certain testimony; (4) erroneously refusing certain…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Rennert v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Dyer v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. R. E. L. McCaskill Co. v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Kenefick v. SchumakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Pufahl v. National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API