CARSON Admx. v. McMAHAN Admr
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The plaintiff, Myrtle A. Carson, filed her complaint herein against the late L. H. McMahan seeking a declaratory judgment. She makes these allegations: That her deceased husband, John H. Carson, had been an attorney at law; prior to his death he had participated as an attorney jointly with L. H. McMahan in the trial and appeal of the case of Putnam v. Jenleins, 204 Or 691, 285 P2d 532, as a result of which a substantial at*40torneys’ fee had been earned by the efforts of her deceased husband and L. H. McMahan; that the efforts of her deceased husband had been instrumental in the successful…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Archambeau v. EdmunsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Reed v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Putnam v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Underwood v. OverstreetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Bailey v. GriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fitzgibbon v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Wolf Corporation v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Hupp v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Slocum v. LangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State ex rel. Highway Commission v. Chaparral Recreation Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.