Legal Opinion

Fitzgibbon v. Carey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 1984No. A8101-00376; CA A28010PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This dispute is between lawyers over the division of an attorney fees award. Plaintiffs, a partnership, and defendant, a professional corporation, associated to represent the plaintiff in a class action and other related cases. The class action was successfully prosecuted and generated $869,000 in attorney fees. Defendant refused to divide the fee equally with plaintiffs on the ground that they failed to do half of the work the cases required and that an equal division of the fee would violate DR 2-107. Plaintiffs seek to compel an equal division by this action for an accounting, alleging…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Armor v. LantzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tom E. MacUrdy v. Sikov & Love, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Canel and Hale, Ltd. v. TobinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Duggins v. Guardianship of WashingtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API