Legal Opinion

Foster v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 12, 1983No. 82-324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs in this case brought an action for sale for division. The facts are undisputed. Alfred and Mattie Foster, husband and wife, had owned a piece of property as tenants in common. Alfred Foster owned an undivided one-fourth interest, and Mattie Foster owned an undivided three-fourths interest in the land. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Bessemer (mortgagee) held a mortgage on the property.

On September 18, 1961, a foreclosure sale was held, and the property was conveyed to mortgagee. On September 29, 1961, the property was redeemed and reconveyed by deed to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trauner v. LowreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Long v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Beers v. PuseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Grady P. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Sanchez v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Bolte v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API