Legal Opinion

Long v. King

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1936No. 4 Div. 914PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The due foreclosure of the mortgage of James H. Long, Jr., and wife to the Atlanta Joint Stock Land Bank effectually cut off the equity of redemption of the mortgagor, and left only the statutory right of redemption to be exercised by those named in the statute (section 10140, Code 1923) in the mode, and within the time, and upon the conditions therein prescribed. Hudson v. Morton, 231 Ala. 392, 165 So. 227; Denson v. Provident Mutual Life Ins. Co., 231 Ala. 574, 166 So. 33.

Complainant to the bill in this cause was a junior mortgagee, and, as such, was authorized to exercise…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Francis v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Hayden v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Allison v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Snow v. Montesano Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Upchurch v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Rudisill v. BucknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Huie v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Morgan Plan Company v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Bettis v. BettisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API