Legal Opinion

Bolte v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 2006No. 1040793 and 1040850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented by these appeals is whether the trial court erred in determining that the nonademption policy of §43-8-227(a)(1), Ala. Code 1975, applied and that, therefore, Era Robertson was entitled at Silas Downey's death to the proceeds due from the sale of real property devised to Robertson but sold before Downey died.

I. History

Downey executed a three-page will on April 1, 1988. His wife had died before he executed the will. Article Two of Downey's will made the following bequest to Robertson, his wife's sister:

"[A]ll right, title, and interest I may have in and to any real estate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Gilbert Imported Hardwoods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Trauner v. LowreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Kelly v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Willis v. BarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. A.E. v. M.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Alvarado v. Estate of KiddSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API