Ilan Golan (Doing Business as Golan Products) v. Pingel Enterprise, Inc., Wayne Pingel, Donna M. Pingel, and Arlen Ness
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, Han Golan (“Golan”), seeks review of the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment to the defendants-ap-pellees, Pingel Enterprise, Inc., Wayne and Donna Pingel, and Arlen Ness (together “Pingel”), on Golan’s federal and state antitrust and unfair competition claims, and state tort claims. The district court determined that none of Golan’s claims could survive Pingel’s motion for summary judgment because Pingel made no actionable false or misleading statements. We affirm…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corporation v. Elekta Ab, Elekta Instrument Ab, Elekta Instruments, Inc., and Elekta Oncology Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Ormco Corporation v. Align TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Scott Timber Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Globetrotter Software, Inc. v. Elan Computer Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.