Francis v. Scheper
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.
In the principal suit, plaintiff Francis obtained judgment against all 3 defendants for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, *443which injuries were received by reason of the negligence of, or attributable to, the defendants. On the trial of the statutory issue in garnishment, now under consideration on appeal, plaintiff obtained a judgment against the garnishee defendant, the insurer of Howard Houck, one of the principal defendants. Garnishee defendant, the Shelby Mutual Casualty Company, appeals.
In the principal suit, the court charged the jury that plaintiff could not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Pawlicki v. HollenbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Konopka v. Jackson County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Allor v. DubayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Pietrantonio v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Powers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Group Insurance v. CzopekMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. StarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Shepard Marine Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.