Legal Opinion

Jeffers v. Hulen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1921No. Civ. No. 2280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

Plaintiff as administrator of the estate of W. C. Jeffers, deceased, brought this action against the defendant to quiet title to ten acres of land in the possession of the defendant. The complaint is in the usual form and the answer, in addition to the customary denials, alleges that the defendant is, and for more than ten years prior to the commencement of the action has been, the owner and in possession of the land. W. C. Jeffers on the tenth day of September, 1908, executed an instrument in the form of an ordinary grant, bargain, and sale deed, caused it to be recorded, and on the next day…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Boyce v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Carpentier v. SmallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. De Cazara v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merkle v. MerkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Denning v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Santa Ana Mortgage & Investment Co. v. KinslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Denning v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API