Legal Opinion
United States v. Bell
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided August 18, 1997No. 96-1218; Crim.App. No. 93-0845PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge:
On April 7, 1993, appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone at Naval Legal Service Office, San Francisco, California. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of unauthorized absence, disobeying a petty officer, making a false official statement, larceny (3 specifications), burglary (2 specifications), and housebreaking, in violation of Articles 86, 91, 107, 121, 129, and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 891, 907, 921, 929, and 930, respectively.1 Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. ClevidenceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. BauerbachArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. DearingNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. BigelowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. BellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.