Legal Opinion

United States v. Clevidence

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 30, 1982No. 41252/CG; CGCMS 23510PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

This case involves the evil of inordinate, unexplained delay in the post-trial review that was condemned by our Court in Dunlap v. Convening Authority, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 135, 48 C.M.R. 751 (1974).

On April 13, 1979, a special court-martial convicted appellant of two specifications of failing to repair, one specification of disrespect to a superior commissioned officer, and four specifications of failure to obey lawful orders, in violation of Articles 86, 89, and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 889, and 892, respectively. He was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. PlayerU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1975
  4. United States v. ClevidenceU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. OwensU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. MatiasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  4. United States v. CollazoArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  5. Diaz v. The Judge Advocate General of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API