Legal Opinion

State v. Bauer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1933No. 29,428PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge of a 15-year old girl and appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The first assignment of error relates to the refusal of the court to permit counsel of defendant to interrogate each prospective juror as to his knowledge of the law on these subjects, thus stated by him:

“May the record show that counsel for the defendant will ask the following questions of each prospective juror: First, that if the court instructs them that it is upon the state to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sneed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
  2. Ryan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. People v. . ConklinNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. State v. TurleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  5. State v. DouthittNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. People v. BoulwareNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. McGee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API