Legal Opinion

Voketz v. City of Decatur

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 13, 2018No. 17-11941PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judge:

*904In 2010, Decatur residents passed a referendum to change Decatur's form of government, including how the city council was elected. City officials, however, decided not to implement the referendum because they believed doing so would violate § 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Gary Voketz filed this lawsuit in 2014 to compel Decatur to implement the referendum. The City and its current councilmembers again contend that they cannot do so because it would violate § 5.

After initially denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment based on § 5, the district court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Greenberg v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Reno v. Bossier Parish School BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Georgia v. Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Abuharba v. DoeDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. Anderson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
  3. Anthony v. JeffreysDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Austin v. RhoadesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. Black v. AsselmeierDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API