Legal Opinion

Georgia v. Ashcroft, Attorney General

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 2003No. 02-182PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

In this case, we decide whether Georgia’s State Senate redistricting plan should have been precleared under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 79 Stat. 439, as renumbered and amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973c. Section 5 requires that before a covered jurisdiction’s new voting “standard, prac*466tice, or procedure” goes into effect, it must be precleared by either the Attorney General of the United States or a federal court to ensure that the change “does not have the purpose and will not have the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color.” 42 U. S. C. § 1973c.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Purcell v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  5. League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2006

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API