Legal Opinion
Hoefer v. Hall
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1965No. 7679Published
1Opinion of the Court
411 P.2d 230 (1965)
75 N.M. 751
Herman F. HOEFER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Tate HALL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 7679.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
December 6, 1965.
Rehearing Denied February 14, 1966.
McKenna & Sommer, Santa Fe, for appellant.
Bigbee & Byrd, Arthur Coleman, Santa Fe, for appellee.
COMPTON, Justice.
The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant to recover on a promissory note in the amount of $5,000.00, executed and delivered to him by the defendant and alleged to be for monies loaned.
The defendant admitted the execution and delivery of the note but affirmatively answered, among…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Lanier v. BowdoinNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Homestake Mining Co. v. Mid-Continent Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Bromfield v. Trinidad Nat. Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Hoefer v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.