Legal Opinion
Bromfield v. Trinidad Nat. Inv. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1929No. 114PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
The appellant sued the Trinidad National Investment Company on certain notes. The company admitted its liability thereon, but asked that there be set off a deposit of the Trinidad National Bank in the Drovers’ National Bank, of which appellant is receiver; and for an accounting of certain securities pledged as collateral to the notes sued on. The cause was transferred to the equity side and the trial court, after hearing the evidence, allowed the set-off. The controversy centers around the propriety of the set-off.
The facts are not in dispute. The investment company…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Brown v. SpoffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Knox v. First Security Bank of UtahCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Hibernia National Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Clarke v. Hot Springs Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Continental Oil Co. v. BellMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- In the Matter of Berger Steel Company, Inc., Debtor. Inland Steel Company v. Berger Steel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.