Pittsburgh v. Lamm
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Miami Circuit Court; Joseph N. Tillett, Judge. Action by Willis C. Lamm against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals, and asks leave to amend the assignment of errors to present for review- the ruling on a motion for a nunc pro tunc entry filed subsequent to the perfection of the appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.
This cause is before the court on appellant’s petition to make additional assignment of error. The prior history of the proceeding is as follows: The cause was tried below and a verdict rendered in appellee’s favor May 7, 1913, being at the April term, 1913, of the trial court. Judgment was rendered on the verdict from which an appeal was taken to this court, which appeal is now pending. At the November term, 1915, of the trial court, being after the transcript on appeal and appellant’s and appellee’s briefs were filed in this court, appellant petitioned the trial court for an entry nunc pro…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Harris v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- McMahan v. WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Driver v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Hamilton v. BurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petition of BreedingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Chenoweth v. ChenowethIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Crawford v. BeatriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952