Legal Opinion

McMahan v. Works

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7329PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— The appellant, who was the plaintiff below, demanded a trial by jury of the issues joined. This the court refused, and upon a trial had found for the defendants and gave judgment accordingly.

The action was a proceeding supplementary to execution. The complaint was against John Works and Luther Lucas, and averred the recovery by the plaintiff in the Tippecanoe Circuit Court of a judgment against Jared Jarvis and John Works for the sum of $236.31 and costs, which remains unpaid ; that an execution had been issued thereon against said defendants ; and that said Works had money demands and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake Erie, Wabash & St. Louis Railroad v. HeathIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. HowesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Burt v. HœttingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Norristown, &c., Turnpike Co. v. BurketIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Coffin v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Tomlinson v. BainakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. American White Bronze Co. v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Burkett v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Fish v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Supreme Court · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API