Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Crawford v. Beatrice

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1952No. 18,118Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

Wiltrout, P. J.

I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion and in the reasons assigned therefor. As an additional reason for affirming the judgment, I desire to point out that appellant has not presented any question concerning the propriety of the nunc pro tunc entry. Any error in the auxiliary proceedings to correct the trial court’s record in aid of an appeal must be challenged by an additional assignment of errors, and this was not done. Adler and Others v. Sewell and Others (1868), 29 Ind. 598; Hannah et ux. v. Dorrell (1881), 73 Ind. 465; Williams et al. v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. ClemensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ferris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hannah v. DorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Williams v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API