Legal Opinion
Quigley v. Wiley
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
This is an action of replevin. The property in question was a carload of lumber which, as appears from the bill of lading, was shipped by Ealph H. Burnside, receiver for the C. D. Johnson Lumber Company, from Toledo, Oregon, consigned to “order of” shipper, destination East Dorset, Vermont, with directions to carrier to notify Perley E. Eaton, East Dorset, Vermont.
The defendant, an officer, attached this lumber as the propertj' of Eaton in an action brought against him by the Pacific Lumber Agency, and this suit is brought under P. L. 1910 (G. L. 2099) which permits one who is the owner of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Forbes v. Boston and Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Commercial Bank of Keokuk v. . PfeifferNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Neill & Ellingham v. Rogers Bros. Produce Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Pacific Lumber Agency v. National Aircraft Materials Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1936
- State v. FossSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Quigley v. WileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
- St. Johnsbury & L.C.R.R. v. Skeels & Weidman, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1963