Legal Opinion

Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. NIA Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Friedmann, J.

On the instant appeal, we must determine whether the three-year Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 214 (6), as amended in 1996 (L 1996, ch 623, § 1), which governs certain malpractice actions, applies to bar the instant action against insurance brokers to recover damages arising out of their alleged failure to procure appropriate insurance for their client, or whether the action is governed by the six-year Statute of Limitations applicable to breach of contract actions (see, CPLR 213). Stated differently, we must determine whether insurance brokers are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Video Corp. of America v. Frederick Flatto Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  2. Lamendola v. MossaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001
  3. Morse Diesel International v. CNA Insurance CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Gugliotta v. Apollo Roland Brokerage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Lamendola v. MossaCivil Court of the City of New York · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API