Legal Opinion

Riverview Milling Co. v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYarser, J.

Tbe petitioner assigns error (1, 2, 3) in permitting counsel for respondent to ask tbe witness Hathcock, president of petitioner, certain questions as to wbat, in bis opinion, would have been petitioner’s damages if tbe State bigbway bridge bad been built below petitioner’s ferry. Tbe witness answered tbat be did not tbink tbe ferry would be worth mucb if a free way to cross bad been provided. Tbe same kind of evidence was elicited on redirect examination. Tbis witness bad previously given bis opinion as to tbe damages suffered by petitioner on account of tbe building of tbe bridge. Tbe same…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Kornegay v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Hodges v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API