Legal Opinion
Schlemmer v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 16, 1986No. C0-86-612PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Former employees of respondent Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. (CENEX) claim they were unlawfully discharged on the basis of age. The employees appeal the trial court’s determination that they failed to establish this claim. Appellants allege inadequate findings and insufficient evidence to support the findings, conclusions, and judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
CENEX
Respondent CENEX is a regional farm supply cooperative that produces and markets petroleum and agricultural products. CENEX employs approximately 2500 people in several states, with headquarters in Minnesota.
In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Marilee S. ELLIOTT, Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Kohn v. City of Minneapolis Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Whitaker v. 3M Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.