Towe, Hester & Erwin, Inc. v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUETTNER, Judge.
Towe, Hester & Erwin, Inc. (TH & E), a licensed insurance agency in Lawton, sued defendants, a group of affiliated non-resident insurance companies (collectively, Continental). TH & E alleged that it was forced to sign a “Rehabilitation Program” agreement under threat of immediate termination of the agency agreement. TH & E further alleged that neither the Rehabilitation Program Agreement nor the Circle Agent Five-Year Market Agreement, dated August 21, 1990, were part of, or subject to, the arbitration clause in the January 1, 1992 Agency Agreement. TH & E claimed it…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Thompson v. Bar-S Foods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Liberty Builders, Inc. v. Horton Ex Rel. Estate of HortonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Booker v. SumnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Fleming Companies, Inc. v. Tru Discount FoodsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- High Sierra Energy, L.P. v. HullCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.