Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Bar-S Foods Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 2, 2007No. 101,973PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, J.
T1 In this case we decide whether Plaintiff/ Appellee Irene Stephanie Thompson is required to submit her state law retaliatory discharge claim to arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16. Her claim originated in state district court pursuant to the Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Act (WCA), specifically the provisions at 85 0.S.2001 § 5 1 (since amended). Under the facts of this case, we hold Appellee Thompson is not required to submit her elaim to arbitration. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (COCA) is vacated. The order of the trial…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Walker v. BuildDirect.com Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- HOWELL'S WELL SERVICE v. FOCUS GROUP ADVISORSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Howard v. Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Key Finance, Inc. v. KoonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- High Sierra Energy, L.P. v. HullCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.