Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 23, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

This matter is opened before the Court upon the petition of John Doe 1 (“petitioner”) for a writ of habeas corpus to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and to withdraw his guilty plea pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Petitioner has also moved to amend his petition pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. The petition has been decided upon the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to amend will be granted, but the petition will be denied.

BACKGROUND

Petitioner was…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Darity v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000
  2. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API