Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Schultze

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 5, 1939No. 20147-20150PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

The United States through its District Attorney filed separate criminal informations against Sid Schultze, Sr., Gordon Schultze, George Stebbins, Jr., and George Stebbins, Sr., charging said defendants with violation of 16 U.S.C.A. § 703, and the regulations promulgated thereunder pertaining to the hunting and killing of migratory birds. The four cases were heard together.

The pertinent part of Section 703 of Title 16 reads as follows: “Unless and except as permitted by regulations * * * it shall be unlawful at any time, by any means or in any manner, to pursue, hunt,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Fmc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Robert WulffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Corbin Farm ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1978
  4. Mahler v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
  5. United States v. Stephen S. Boynton James R. Booth Bernard Dadds, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API