Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen S. Boynton James R. Booth Bernard Dadds, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1995No. 94-5481PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge ERVIN and Senior Judge PHILLIPS joined.

OPINION

MURNAGHAN,' .Circuit Judge:

Defendants were convicted of hunting migratory birds over a baited area, a strict liability crime. Defendants admitted at a bench trial that they were hunting migratory birds over bait, but claimed that the grain which constituted the bait was scattered as the result of “normal agricultural planting or harvesting” or “bona fide agricultural operations and procedures” and thus that their hunting was lawful pursuant to the exceptions in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. CorrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Apollo Energies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Peggy Hill v. Barry CogginsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Pressley Ridge Schools, Inc. v. StottlemyerDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API