Legal Opinion

Brown v. VanTuyl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1952No. 31863PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

James E. Harris, apparently a somewhat experienced commercial fisherman, and Theodor A. VanTuyl, a person not so experienced in the ways of the sea, purchased the fishing boat “Heceta” from Martell W. Brown and J. Lester Welsh under a conditional sale contract, whereunder, as might be expected, title to the boat remained in the sellers until purchasers should perform their contractual obligations. Purchasers jointly gave their promissory note for $1,350 to Brown. VanTuyl personally owned certain real estate in Pacific county. He mortgaged it to Brown as further security in order to consummate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tackett v. MilburnWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hynes v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Coovert v. IngwersenWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Witenberg v. SylviaWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Tardif v. HellerstedtWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of DandWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Holland Furnace Co. v. KorthWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Detjen v. DetjenWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Doss v. SchullerWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hovila v. BartekWashington Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API