Legal Opinion

Hynes v. Hynes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1947No. 30163PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbel, J.

Plaintiff and defendant met in Anchorage, Alaska, in the year 1937. At that time, and since, plaintiff was a single person. Defendant was then married to a man by the name of Quetschke. Shortly after they met, plaintiff learned that defendant was a married woman. Plaintiff testified that he left Alaska for Seattle, and, two or three weeks later, he met defendant there after she got off the Alaska boat. They went to Seaview and held themselves out as husband and wife.

A contract was entered into for the purchase of certain real estate from a man by the name of Abrams and his wife. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sloan v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. LeDoux v. Seattle North Pacific Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. First National Bank v. White-Dulaney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Stans v. BaiteyWashington Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Creasman v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wood v. CollinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co. v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. In Re Estate of VerbeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Oregon Mutual Insurance v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API