Legal Opinion
Boden v. Anaconda Minerals Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 5, 1990No. C2-85-1307PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
This case is before the Court upon the motion of defendant, Anaconda Minerals Company, et al. (hereinafter “Anaconda”) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Said motion was filed herein on April 29, 1988. Plaintiff seeks relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, along with pendent state law claims. After review of the pleadings filed in this case, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS
This Title VII case, with pendent state law claims, was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ivey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Francis v. Gaylord Container Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Garcimonde-Fisher v. Area203 Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Kohn v. GTE North, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Thomas v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.