Legal Opinion

Swink v. Weintraub

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 2009No. COA07-960, COA07-1088PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

This opinion addresses two appeals arising from the same wrongful death action brought by plaintiff Paul Swink individually and as administrator of the estate of his wife, Margaret Swink. Defendants Dr. Richard A. Weintraub and the Southeastern Heart and Vascular Center, P.A. (“Southeastern”) appeal from (1) the trial court’s judgment based on the jury’s verdict finding them negligent in the death of Mrs. Swink (COA07-1088), and (2) the trial court’s order taxing costs against defendants (COA07-960). The two appeals were previously consolidated for hearing and now are consolidated…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Condra v. Atlanta Orthopaedic Group P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. In Re the Proposed Foreclosure of Claim of Lien Filed Against JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. King v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Swink v. WeintraubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Blanchard v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API