Legal Opinion
Condra v. Atlanta Orthopaedic Group P.C.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 29, 2009No. S08G1833PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.
We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in this medical malpractice action to consider (1) whether plaintiffs were properly prohibited from inquiring at trial into the personal practices of defendants’ expert witnesses with respect to the medical treatment at issue in the case; and (2) whether the so-called “hindsight” jury instruction was appropriately given under the circumstances presented. The Court of Appeals answered both questions in the affirmative. Condra v. Atlanta Orthopaedic Group, P.C., 292 Ga. App. 276 (664 SE2d 281) (2008). We now reverse on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mason v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Bergman v. KelseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Smith v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Brannen v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- An v. Active Pest Control South, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Boring v. STATE BANK AND TRUST CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Griffin v. BankstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Burroughs v. Mitchell CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- David Oaks v. Timothy R. Chamberlain, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.