Legal Opinion

Prentice v. McKay

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1909No. 2,603PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Madison County; D. K. Cheadle, Judge. Action by Octavia Prentice against Caroline McKay and another. Judgment for plaintiff!, and defendants appeal from it and an order denying them a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This action was brought by Octavia Prentice against Caroline McKay and Thomas Galahan to quiet title of plaintiff to a certain water right, and to secure an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the free use and enjoyment of such right by the plaintiff. The court found that the plaintiff was the owner of forty acres of land in section 18, township 4 south, of range 5 west, in Madison county; that this land is arid, and that forty miner’s inches of water are required for its successful irrigation; that in 1893 the predecessor in interest of plaintiff owned the land in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. St. Helena Water Co. v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Great Falls Water Works Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Welch v. GarrettIdaho Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wild River Adventures, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of School District No. 8Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kuhlman v. RiveraMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. PPL MONTANA, LLC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Wills v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API