Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bearden v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1996No. 94-1265PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Former R.C. 4123.57 required a successful applicant for partial disability compensation to select the method of payment — as impaired earning capacity benefits under R.C. 4123.57(A) or as permanent partial disability compensation under R.C. 4123.57(B). However, for “good cause shown,” a claimant could change his election. R.C. 4123.57(A). In this case, we are asked to determine whether the commission abused its discretion in finding that appellant’s requested election change was not supported by “good cause.” For the following reasons, we find the commission did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Combs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Simpson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Long v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Bearden v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API