Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Long v. Mihm

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1992No. 91-1244PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Former R.C. 4123.57 required a successful applicant for partial disability compensation to choose the method of payment — as perma*529nent partial disability compensation under R.C. 4123.57(B) or as 4123.57(A) impaired earning capacity benefits. All future partial disability awards were to be paid according to the method selected. However, for “good cause shown” a claimant could change his or her election. R.C. 4123.57(A). (136 Ohio Laws, Part I, 1160.)

“To establish good cause, a claimant must prove (1) unforeseen changed circumstances subsequent to the initial election, and (2) actual impaired…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Combs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Simpson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mathess v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Bearden v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Delong v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Doughty v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Bearden v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API