Legal Opinion
Eierman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-4998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs instituted this action in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas alleging that Conrail and its employees engaged in a deliberate course of harassing conduct with a goal of causing plaintiff Charles Eierman to be discharged. Compensation for injuries is sought pursuant to the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., and the Pennsylvania common law of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Despite the bar to removal of FELA cases presented by 28 U.S.C. § 1445(a), defendant removed the case to this Court. The basis for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harold R. Magnuson v. Burlington Northern, Inc., D. S. Nelson, J. H. Woolford, and G. J. O'COnnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- George Choate v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Selected Risks Insurance v. KobelinskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Welby v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Scales v. Natl. Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Cawthard v. Flagship Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
- Andricola v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990