Harold R. Magnuson v. Burlington Northern, Inc., D. S. Nelson, J. H. Woolford, and G. J. O'COnnell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Magnuson appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint based on common law intentional infliction of emotional distress on the ground that the gravamen of the action was a “minor” dispute growing out of his employment relationship with the defendant railroad and thus subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the dispute resolving mechanisms under the Railway Labor Act (“R.L.A.”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 151, et seq.1 He contends that the district court erred in removing the action from the state court to the federal court and in dismissing it because (1) the gist of his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Transportation Union v. Penn Central Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Local 1477 United Transportation Union and Lodge 666 United Transportation Union v. George P. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- John Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Lansalot A. Olguin v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Daryl A. Miller v. At & T Network Systems, an at & T Technologies, Inc. Group, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.