Legal Opinion

People v. Cheong Foon Ark

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1882No. 10,777PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of conviction and from an-order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Freelon, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larbeny, and larceny is defined by Section 484 of the Penal Code to be, “ the felonious stealing, taking, carrying, lending, or driving away, the personal property of another.” The Court instructed the jury as follows: “Grand larceny is the stealing, taking, or carrying away, the personal property of another, of the value of more than fifty dollars,”—omitting the word felonious. The charge was erroneous, as it omitted that word.

The Court told the jury that grand larceny is the stealing, taking, or carrying away (in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. KerrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. MizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. People v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API