Irving Brodsky v. The Perth Amboy National Bank, a Banking Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises out of the dismissal by the district court of a counterclaim asserted by the Perth Amboy National Bank (“Bank”) against Irving Brodsky. The district court based its dismissal both on the failure of Bank to join indispensable parties and on the merits.
Our attention will be directed solely to the indispensable parties issue inasmuch as we deem it to be critical and dispositive on this appeal.
The facts are detailed in the district court’s opinion, D.C.N.J.1957, 156 F.Supp. 316. Only the following facts, relevant to our consideration, need here be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Martucci v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Fenwick v. U.C.C. of N.J.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Conservation Council of Western Australia, Inc. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Crawford v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Ricci v. State Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Ralston Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- Rush & Halloran, Inc. v. Delaware Valley Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.