Legal Opinion

Rush & Halloran, Inc. v. Delaware Valley Financial Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 26808PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This action is brought by plaintiffs as third-party beneficiaries under a written agreement between defendant and North American Acceptance Corporation (hereinafter “NAAC”), a Pennsylvania corporation, for an injunction, an accounting, and damages for breach of contract. Plaintiffs assert that under a contract dated January 17, 1959, the defendant agreed that, for a period of two years from that date, it would place all insurance in connection with contracts financing mobile homes which it should acquire from any source other than NAAC through Rush and Halloran, Inc.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Logan v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. American Universal Ins. Co. v. SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson & Johnson v. Coopervision, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  2. Direction Associates, Inc. v. Programming & Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Merco Manufacturing, Inc. v. J. P. McMichael Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1974
  4. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. DitoroDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Soar v. National Football League Players' Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API