Legal Opinion
Ricci v. State Board of Law Examiners
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 21, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-2653PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
A. L. HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.
Alexander D. Ricci, plaintiff herein, has brought suit against the Pennsylvania State Board of Law Examiners, alleging that Rule 9 A(2) of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1 as interpreted by the Board, is violative of the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution in that it purportedly denies the plaintiff due process and equal protection of the laws. The plaintiff has invoked this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, 2281, and 2284.
Presently before the Court are the defendant State Board’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In the Matter of Julian J. Roberts Attorney-At-Law. Appeal of Julian J. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Anthony J. Sestric v. William G. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Delgado v. McTigheDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Shapiro v. CookeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
- Murphy v. State Bd. of Law Exam. for Com. of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.