Legal Opinion
Paulsen v. Manson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1984No. 11219PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether a defendant who unsuccessfully attempts to appeal after counsel have been permitted to withdraw *334without complying fully with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S. Ct. 2094, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), can be found to have deliberately bypassed his direct appeal. We hold that he cannot and remand for further proceedings.
The petitioner, Ronald Paulsen, appeals from a judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the court found that he deliberately bypassed a direct appeal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- O'Bryan v. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Valeriano v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Paulsen v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Barlow v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.